Skip to content
Court Shark Tennis Desk

Bellucci vs Atmane Prediction: Almaty Open 2026 Round of 16

Bellucci breaks more often on hard courts, but their holding rates are equal. Court Shark's model narrowly favors Atmane in Almaty.

Share

Terence Atmane faces Mattia Bellucci in the Almaty Open round of 16. Bellucci's hard-court advantage is on return, not serve, and Court Shark's model still gives Atmane a 56% chance.

A quarterfinal place against contrasting recent form

The Almaty Open round of 16 offers a quarterfinal place when Terence Atmane meets Mattia Bellucci on Thursday. Bellucci's stronger return record makes him a serious threat, but it does not establish an advantage across both service and return games. The distinction matters here.

Bellucci arrived with a six-match winning run, while Atmane had won his most recent match after a less consistent stretch. Their last 10 hard-court matches produced an 8-2 record for Bellucci, compared with an even split for Atmane. The immediate question is whether Bellucci can turn that stronger recent record into more pressure on Atmane's serve as they compete for a quarterfinal place. The surface figures offer a clear reason to consider that possibility, rather than a decisive answer about the winner.

Service games held: where they stand

Article snapshot, Oct 22, 2026 · Not live

Each dot is one of the ATP top 100 with enough matches in the last 52 weeks. Terence Atmane ranks ahead of 56 of 94; Mattia Bellucci is 61st of 94.

Service games held, last 52 weeks, against the ATP top 100
PlayerService games heldPlace
Terence Atmane83.0%Ahead of 56 of 94
Mattia Bellucci79.9%61st of 94
Field median81.6%
Field best (Jannik Sinner)94.5%1st
Source: Court Shark model and match data.

Equal holding rates, unequal returns

Over the last 52 weeks on hard courts, both players held 83% of their service games, leaving no observed holding advantage for Bellucci in that window. Their holding rates were level. That changes the premise of the matchup: Bellucci's case rests on creating more breaks, rather than protecting his own serve more reliably than Atmane.

Bellucci broke in 24% of his return games, while Atmane managed 15%. That difference suggests Bellucci has been more capable of putting pressure on opponents' service games. If their service performance remains comparable, the return gap gives Bellucci the clearer route to separating them within a set.

Atmane's sample covered 32 matches and Bellucci's covered 41. Those are sustained records rather than snapshots from this tournament, but they are not a direct test of how either player's return will fare against this particular opponent.

Bellucci can overturn the forecast on return

The most concrete route to a Bellucci win is Atmane's weak return record carrying into this match while Bellucci continues to create breaks. Atmane cannot rely on matching Bellucci's recent returning output. If he struggles to threaten service games, even a small decline in his own holding performance could leave him with little room to recover.

Their only previous meeting went Atmane's way at the Australian Open in 2025, with a 7-6(7) 6-4 result. That supports his ability to win this pairing on hard courts, but a single meeting cannot establish a dependable matchup advantage. The opening set also provides a concrete example of a set reaching a tiebreak rather than being settled by a break.

Recovery could matter, too. Bellucci had played six matches in the preceding fortnight, while Atmane had played just one, giving Atmane a lighter recent workload without establishing that Bellucci is fatigued.

Head-to-head by surface

Article snapshot, Oct 22, 2026 · Not live

Terence Atmane and Mattia Bellucci have met once. Terence Atmane leads 1-0.

Head-to-head record, Terence Atmane first
SurfaceTerence AtmaneMattia Bellucci
All surfaces10
Hard10
Source: Court Shark model and match data.

The prediction

Court Shark's model favors Atmane with a 56% win probability, while the market consensus gives him 47%, leaving the model and market on opposite sides. It is a narrow preference. Bellucci's return advantage is substantial enough to challenge the forecast, but the equal holding rates do not support calling him superior in both service and return games.

Court Shark's AI analyst, which reads the matchup without the market, also picks Atmane and agrees with the model. The tennis case for that choice is his comparable service protection and previous win over Bellucci, rather than stronger recent form. The model's match-length forecast has a median of 23 total games, consistent with a competitive match rather than an exact score prediction.

The middle half of forecast outcomes runs from 20 to 31 games. For Atmane, the specific task is to keep Bellucci's stronger return record from producing the first break in a set where his own return offers fewer opportunities.

How long it could go

Article snapshot, Oct 22, 2026 · Not live

A 58% chance the match lasts 20 to 31 games; 23 is the middle of the range.

Chance of each total number of games in the match
Total gamesChance
140.2%
150.8%
161.6%
173.8%
184.8%
197.4%
207.4%
214.8%
2210.2%
239.2%
240.6%
253.5%
267.2%
271.8%
282.6%
292.8%
303.0%
314.6%
325.3%
333.4%
342.5%
354.9%
363.9%
370.3%
381.2%
392.0%
Source: Court Shark model and match data.

Explore this matchup

Compare both players side by side: recent results, surfaces, serve and return.

Player comparison

Article snapshot, Oct 22, 2026 · Not live

Each measure on the same scale: recent wins, wins on this surface, head-to-head wins and the model's chance.

Player comparison
MeasureTerence AtmaneMattia Bellucci
Wins, last 10 matches50% (5-5)80% (8-2)
Wins, last 10 on hard50% (5-5)80% (8-2)
Head-to-head wins100% (1-0)0% (0-1)
Model win probability56%44%
Source: Court Shark model and match data.

Recent form

Article snapshot, Oct 22, 2026 · Not live

Each player's most recent completed matches, up to 10, oldest on the left.

Recent results by player, oldest first
PlayerDateResultOpponentScoreEvent
Terence AtmaneAug 13, 2026WMarton Fucsovics3-1 RETCincinnati Masters
Terence AtmaneAug 15, 2026WTomas Martin Etcheverry6-3 7-6(4)Cincinnati Masters
Terence AtmaneAug 17, 2026LAlexander Zverev6-7(4) 6-7(6)Cincinnati Masters
Terence AtmaneAug 30, 2026LJaume Munar7-6(5) 6-3 1-6 6-7(4) 5-7US Open
Terence AtmaneSep 24, 2026LJaime Faria6-3 6-7(9) 4-6Hangzhou
Terence AtmaneSep 28, 2026WDominik Palan6-1 6-4Jingshan Challenger
Terence AtmaneSep 29, 2026WEnzo Aguiard6-4 6-4Jingshan Challenger
Terence AtmaneSep 30, 2026LElias Ymer6-4 5-7 5-5 RETJingshan Challenger
Terence AtmaneOct 5, 2026LBernard Tomic3-6 6-4 3-5 RETShanghai Masters
Terence AtmaneOct 20, 2026WRinky Hijikata7-6(5) 6-2ATP Almaty
Mattia BellucciOct 4, 2026LLloyd Harris6-1 3-6 6-7Jingshan Challenger
Mattia BellucciOct 5, 2026WElias Ymer4-6 7-5 7-6(3)Shanghai Masters
Mattia BellucciOct 6, 2026WAlexandre Muller6-4 6-2Shanghai Masters
Mattia BellucciOct 7, 2026LYi Zhou4-6 6-3 6-7(4)Shanghai Masters
Mattia BellucciOct 13, 2026WElias Ymer6-2 6-1Jinan Challenger
Mattia BellucciOct 15, 2026WLuka Pavlovic6-4 6-4Jinan Challenger
Mattia BellucciOct 16, 2026WAlexander Shevchenko6-4 6-4Jinan Challenger
Mattia BellucciOct 17, 2026WShintaro Mochizuki6-2 7-6Jinan Challenger
Mattia BellucciOct 18, 2026WMartin Landaluce6-2 4-6 6-3Jinan Challenger
Mattia BellucciOct 21, 2026WTomas Martin Etcheverry7-6(5) 2-6 6-4ATP Almaty
Source: Court Shark model and match data.

Win rate by surface

Article snapshot, Oct 22, 2026 · Not live

Share of matches won on each surface across each player's last 50 matches with full statistics.

Win rate by surface
SurfaceTerence AtmaneMattia Bellucci
Hard40% (14-21)64% (18-10)
Clay40% (4-6)54% (7-6)
Grass20% (1-4)56% (5-4)
Source: Court Shark model and match data.

Serve and return on hard courts

Article snapshot, Oct 22, 2026 · Not live

How often each player held serve and broke serve on hard over their last 50 matches with full statistics, against the tour's all-years average on the surface.

Hold and break rates on hard
MeasureTerence AtmaneMattia BellucciTour average, all years
Service games held81%82%77%
Return games broken15%28%23%
Matches in sample3528
Source: Court Shark model and match data.

Model and market on Terence Atmane

Article snapshot, Oct 22, 2026 · Not live

Terence Atmane's chance as the market consensus priced it from the opening line, next to the Court Shark model.

Terence Atmane's chance to win
ReadingTerence AtmaneMattia Bellucci
Opening consensus41%59%
Latest consensus47%53%
Court Shark model56%44%
Source: Court Shark model and pre-match market consensus.

Model win probability

Article snapshot, Oct 22, 2026 · Not live

The Court Shark model's chance for each player to win this match.

Model win probability by player
PlayerWin probabilityRecent form (last 10)
Terence Atmane56%5-5
Mattia Bellucci44%8-2
Source: Court Shark model and match data.

Ways to win

Article snapshot, Oct 22, 2026 · Not live

Every way the match can finish. The likeliest single result is Terence Atmane in straight sets (34%).

Chance of each final set score
ResultChance
Terence Atmane wins 2-034%
Terence Atmane wins 2-122%
Mattia Bellucci wins 2-119%
Mattia Bellucci wins 2-025%
Source: Court Shark model and match data.

Two years of form

Article snapshot, Oct 22, 2026 · Not live

Each player's pre-match Elo rating since Oct 30, 2024. Latest: Mattia Bellucci 1865 (Oct 7, 2026), Terence Atmane 1849 (Oct 5, 2026).

Pre-match Elo rating over the last two years
PlayerStart of windowTwo-year peakLatest
Terence Atmane1755 (Oct 30, 2024)1875 (Aug 17, 2026)1849 (Oct 5, 2026)
Mattia Bellucci1872 (Nov 13, 2024)1890 (Nov 16, 2024)1865 (Oct 7, 2026)
Source: Court Shark model and match data.
Explore this matchup

Court Shark win probabilities are statistical estimates, not advice. No outcome is guaranteed.

Methodology and sources

How we build model estimates and where our information comes from.

Model estimates and observed results

The win probabilities come from the Court Shark match model, trained on completed ATP and WTA matches. A probability says how often a player in this position wins, not that one result will happen. The model's number for a match is recorded before play and never changed afterwards, so it can be checked against the result.

Sources and citations

Results, scores, rankings and serve statistics come from the Court Shark match database. The market consensus is the pre-match price for each player converted to a probability. Figures in this article are a snapshot taken when it was written.

Limitations

Serve and return rates count only matches with full serve statistics, which are sparser for Challenger and lower-level events, and the tour average they are compared with covers every year on record. Head-to-head records count every meeting with a recorded winner, walkovers and retirements included. Charts and tables are a snapshot and do not update after publication.

About the desk

Who works on the Tennis Desk and how an article is put together. Read about the desk

Editorial standards

What we publish, what we check and how we decide what is fit to print. Read our standards

Corrections

Spotted an error? Write to hello@courtshark.ai and we will correct it and note the change. Read the corrections policy

Share this analysis

Email