Skip to content
Court Shark Tennis Desk

Bouzkova vs Bejlek Prediction: Ningbo 2026 Quarterfinal

Bouzkova's stronger recent results separate her from Bejlek in Ningbo, but Bejlek's hard-court return record makes the matchup less straightforward.

Share

Sara Bejlek faces Marie Bouzkova in the Ningbo quarterfinal, with recent form providing the clearest separation. Court Shark's model gives Bouzkova a 61% chance of reaching the semifinals.

Bouzkova's recent results provide the clearest edge

Friday's Ningbo quarterfinal offers the winner a place in the semifinals. Recent form most clearly separates them: Marie Bouzkova went 7-3 across her latest matches, while Sara Bejlek went 5-5. The same contrast held on hard courts. That makes recent results a more persuasive reason to favor Bouzkova than an assumed advantage based on age or experience alone.

Both arrived at this stage on a two-match winning run, so Bejlek's immediate tournament results narrowed the distinction suggested by their broader form. Bouzkova beat Kamilla Rakhimova and Anastasia Zakharova without dropping a set, while Bejlek beat Alycia Parks and Sorana Cirstea. For Bejlek, this is a chance to extend her recovery after losing to Jasmine Paolini in Wuhan. Bouzkova, meanwhile, has followed her Wuhan loss to Maja Chwalinska with consecutive victories here.

Ways to win

Article snapshot, Oct 22, 2026 · Not live

Every way the match can finish. The likeliest single result is Marie Bouzkova in straight sets (42%).

Chance of each final set score
ResultChance
Sara Bejlek wins 2-023%
Sara Bejlek wins 2-116%
Marie Bouzkova wins 2-119%
Marie Bouzkova wins 2-042%
Source: Court Shark model and match data.

Recent form

Article snapshot, Oct 22, 2026 · Not live

Each player's most recent completed matches, up to 10, oldest on the left.

Recent results by player, oldest first
PlayerDateResultOpponentScoreEvent
Sara BejlekAug 21, 2026WMadison Keys3-6 6-4 7-6(5)Cincinnati
Sara BejlekAug 22, 2026LCori Gauff4-6 1-6Cincinnati
Sara BejlekAug 31, 2026LCristina Bucsa5-7 6-4 1-6US Open
Sara BejlekSep 15, 2026WAlycia Parks6-4 6-3Guadalajara
Sara BejlekSep 17, 2026LCristina Bucsa0-6 4-6Guadalajara
Sara BejlekOct 2, 2026WMaddison Inglis6-3 7-5Beijing
Sara BejlekOct 4, 2026LNaomi Osaka6-7(4) 4-6Beijing
Sara BejlekOct 12, 2026LJasmine Paolini3-6 4-6Wuhan
Sara BejlekOct 20, 2026WAlycia Parks4-6 6-3 6-3WTA Ningbo
Sara BejlekOct 21, 2026WSorana Cirstea7-6(3) 6-4WTA Ningbo
Marie BouzkovaAug 31, 2026WElsa Jacquemot6-2 6-2US Open
Marie BouzkovaSep 3, 2026WHarriet Dart6-2 6-2US Open
Marie BouzkovaSep 5, 2026LIga Swiatek6-7(3) 6-7(3)US Open
Marie BouzkovaSep 25, 2026WSonay Kartal7-6(2) 4-6 6-4BJK Cup Finals
Marie BouzkovaOct 3, 2026WKimberly Birrell6-4 6-4Beijing
Marie BouzkovaOct 5, 2026LQinwen Zheng6-7(3) 6-4 5-7Beijing
Marie BouzkovaOct 12, 2026WClara Tauson6-1 2-0 RETWuhan
Marie BouzkovaOct 14, 2026LMaja Chwalinska6-1 1-6 1-6Wuhan
Marie BouzkovaOct 19, 2026WKamilla Rakhimova6-4 6-4WTA Ningbo
Marie BouzkovaOct 21, 2026WAnastasia Zakharova7-5 6-2WTA Ningbo
Source: Court Shark model and match data.

The rankings support Bouzkova, but return numbers do not

The rankings placed Bouzkova at No. 26, ahead of Bejlek at No. 32. That supports the direction of the recent results, although the ranking difference alone does not suggest a large separation between these quarterfinalists. The surface evidence is less tidy. Bejlek's hard-court return record supplies a concrete reason to resist treating Bouzkova as an overwhelming favorite.

Over the last year on hard courts, Bejlek broke serve in 42% of return games, compared with Bouzkova's 36%. Their service hold rates were close, with Bejlek also narrowly ahead. My reading is that Bejlek has a credible route through return pressure, even though Bouzkova has converted more of her recent matches into wins. Those surface records do not establish how either serve handles the other's return. They complicate the form argument rather than erase it.

A deciding set would strengthen Bejlek's case

Bejlek's career deciding-set record offers another specific route to an upset: she won 21 of 31 such matches. A close match suits her case. If her return results translate into enough breaks to extend the contest, Bouzkova's recent form becomes a less comfortable basis for the forecast. That is a conditional argument, not evidence that Bejlek will force a final set.

In career deciding sets, Bouzkova won 52 of 103 matches, a less favorable record in that situation. The players had never met, so there was no direct history to establish whether Bejlek's left-handed game would cause particular problems for Bouzkova. Nor does the schedule point clearly toward fatigue: both last played the previous day and were listed as fresh. The concrete threat to the favorite is Bejlek's return game producing a prolonged match, rather than a known physical disadvantage for Bouzkova.

The prediction

Court Shark's model favors Bouzkova with a 61% win probability, while the market consensus has her at 60%. The market price was unchanged from its opening reading, leaving the current estimates closely aligned without establishing why they reached similar conclusions. The preference is clear, not overwhelming.

Court Shark's AI analyst, which reads the matchup without the market, also picks Bouzkova and agrees with the model's direction. Her stronger recent results provide the clearest supporting reason; Bejlek's return record is the strongest counterargument. The model's median match length is 20 games, which points toward a relatively compact contest rather than making an exact total a prediction.

The model's likeliest single outcome is Bouzkova winning in straight sets, and the forecast's middle range runs from 17 to 27 games. Bejlek's ability to turn return pressure into a deciding set is the specific result that would most challenge that projected shape.

How long it could go

Article snapshot, Oct 22, 2026 · Not live

A 60% chance the match lasts 17 to 27 games; 20 is the middle of the range.

Chance of each total number of games in the match
Total gamesChance
120.3%
131.4%
143.1%
155.5%
167.8%
178.9%
188.6%
197.9%
206.7%
215.0%
225.7%
233.6%
242.2%
253.7%
263.8%
273.7%
283.9%
293.9%
303.6%
313.2%
322.6%
331.7%
341.2%
351.1%
360.4%
Source: Court Shark model and match data.

Explore this matchup

Compare both players side by side: recent results, surfaces, serve and return.

Player comparison

Article snapshot, Oct 22, 2026 · Not live

Each measure on the same scale: recent wins, wins on this surface, head-to-head wins and the model's chance.

Player comparison
MeasureSara BejlekMarie Bouzkova
Wins, last 10 matches50% (5-5)70% (7-3)
Wins, last 10 on hard50% (5-5)70% (7-3)
Model win probability39%61%
Source: Court Shark model and match data.

Win rate by surface

Article snapshot, Oct 22, 2026 · Not live

Share of matches won on each surface across each player's last 50 matches with full statistics.

Win rate by surface
SurfaceSara BejlekMarie Bouzkova
Hard67% (22-11)48% (14-15)
Clay62% (8-5)70% (7-3)
GrassToo few matches (4)82% (9-2)
Source: Court Shark model and match data.

Serve and return on hard courts

Article snapshot, Oct 22, 2026 · Not live

How often each player held serve and broke serve on hard over their last 50 matches with full statistics, against the tour's all-years average on the surface.

Hold and break rates on hard
MeasureSara BejlekMarie BouzkovaTour average, all years
Service games held67%65%63%
Return games broken42%36%37%
Matches in sample3329
Source: Court Shark model and match data.

Model and market on Sara Bejlek

Article snapshot, Oct 22, 2026 · Not live

Sara Bejlek's chance as the market consensus priced it from the opening line, next to the Court Shark model.

Sara Bejlek's chance to win
ReadingSara BejlekMarie Bouzkova
Opening consensus40%60%
Latest consensus40%60%
Court Shark model39%61%
Source: Court Shark model and pre-match market consensus.

Model win probability

Article snapshot, Oct 22, 2026 · Not live

The Court Shark model's chance for each player to win this match.

Model win probability by player
PlayerWin probabilityRecent form (last 10)
Sara Bejlek39%5-5
Marie Bouzkova61%7-3
Source: Court Shark model and match data.

Service games held: where they stand

Article snapshot, Oct 22, 2026 · Not live

Each dot is one of the WTA top 100 with enough matches in the last 52 weeks. Sara Bejlek is 58th of 64; Marie Bouzkova is 33rd of 64.

Service games held, last 52 weeks, against the WTA top 100
PlayerService games heldPlace
Sara Bejlek63.4%58th of 64
Marie Bouzkova69.5%33rd of 64
Field median69.5%
Field best (Elena Rybakina)83.0%1st
Source: Court Shark model and match data.

Two years of form

Article snapshot, Oct 22, 2026 · Not live

Each player's pre-match Elo rating since Dec 28, 2024. Latest: Marie Bouzkova 1828 (Oct 19, 2026), Sara Bejlek 1767 (Oct 20, 2026).

Pre-match Elo rating over the last two years
PlayerStart of windowTwo-year peakLatest
Sara Bejlek1545 (Dec 28, 2024)1805 (Aug 22, 2026)1767 (Oct 20, 2026)
Marie Bouzkova1773 (Dec 31, 2024)1848 (Oct 5, 2026)1828 (Oct 19, 2026)
Source: Court Shark model and match data.
Explore this matchup

Court Shark win probabilities are statistical estimates, not advice. No outcome is guaranteed.

Methodology and sources

How we build model estimates and where our information comes from.

Model estimates and observed results

The win probabilities come from the Court Shark match model, trained on completed ATP and WTA matches. A probability says how often a player in this position wins, not that one result will happen. The model's number for a match is recorded before play and never changed afterwards, so it can be checked against the result.

Sources and citations

Results, scores, rankings and serve statistics come from the Court Shark match database. The market consensus is the pre-match price for each player converted to a probability. Figures in this article are a snapshot taken when it was written.

Limitations

Serve and return rates count only matches with full serve statistics, which are sparser for Challenger and lower-level events, and the tour average they are compared with covers every year on record. Head-to-head records count every meeting with a recorded winner, walkovers and retirements included. Charts and tables are a snapshot and do not update after publication.

About the desk

Who works on the Tennis Desk and how an article is put together. Read about the desk

Editorial standards

What we publish, what we check and how we decide what is fit to print. Read our standards

Corrections

Spotted an error? Write to hello@courtshark.ai and we will correct it and note the change. Read the corrections policy

Share this analysis

Email