Skip to content
Court Shark Tennis Desk

Bublik vs Marozsan Prediction: Almaty Open 2026 Round of 16

Bublik's stronger service record separates him from Marozsan at the Almaty Open, though recent hard-court results favor the underdog.

Share

Alexander Bublik's serve is the clearest separator against Fabian Marozsan in the Almaty Open round of 16. Court Shark's model gives Bublik a 71% chance of winning.

Bublik's service record sets him apart

An 88% service hold rate on hard courts is the strongest reason to favor Alexander Bublik: his record over the past year exceeded Fabian Marozsan's 80%. That is the clearest separation. It suggests Bublik is better equipped to protect his service games, leaving his opponent fewer openings to turn a competitive set into a winning one.

Thursday's Almaty Open round of 16 puts the No. 22 against the No. 63, with a quarterfinal place available on hard courts. Bublik brings the higher ranking, but Marozsan brings the better recent results on this surface. The broader service comparison also places Bublik well above the field median and Marozsan just below it. For this matchup, service reliability offers a more specific explanation for Bublik's advantage than ranking alone.

Service games held: where they stand

Article snapshot, Oct 21, 2026 · Not live

Each dot is one of the ATP top 100 with enough matches in the last 52 weeks. Alexander Bublik is 10th of 94; Fabian Marozsan is 60th of 94.

Service games held, last 52 weeks, against the ATP top 100
PlayerService games heldPlace
Alexander Bublik87.5%10th of 94
Fabian Marozsan80.0%60th of 94
Field median81.7%
Field best (Jannik Sinner)94.6%1st
Source: Court Shark model and match data.

Recent results point toward Marozsan

Bublik went 4-6 in his last ten hard-court matches, while Marozsan went 6-4. Recent form favors the underdog. That complicates the service comparison because protecting serve more often has not translated into a better recent run of match results for Bublik. The shorter sequence favors Marozsan, although it does not establish how either player will handle this particular opponent.

The return records also lean toward Marozsan, who broke in 19% of return games over the past year on hard courts against Bublik's 16%. His advantage there is smaller than Bublik's advantage on serve, making service protection the more convincing separator in my assessment. Still, Marozsan has a plausible way to keep sets competitive: hold consistently enough to make his slightly stronger return record matter. Neither player's recent return record suggests that repeated breaks should be taken for granted.

A close set could narrow the difference

Tiebreaks offer Marozsan a concrete route around Bublik's service advantage. Bublik won 142 of his career 269 tiebreaks. Marozsan won 64 of his career 119, so the career records do not give Bublik an obvious advantage if both players keep holding through a set. That distinction matters here. A strong hold rate helps a player reach a tiebreak without conceding a break, but it does not itself settle the points that decide it.

There is also no previous meeting to test whether Bublik's usual service protection carries over against Marozsan's return. Their head-to-head was unplayed. Marozsan's latest result was a win over Timofey Skatov in Almaty, while Bublik's latest match ended in defeat against Alexander Zverev in Shanghai. Those results give Marozsan a recent win at this event, but they do not establish a direct matchup advantage.

The prediction

Court Shark's model favors Bublik with a 71% win probability, and the market consensus gives him the same chance. The market opened at 65% before moving toward him. The agreement is clear. It establishes a shared favorite, rather than a difference between the model's estimate and the current market assessment.

Court Shark's AI analyst, which reads the matchup without the market, also picks Bublik, agreeing with the model. His stronger service protection is the clearest tennis reason to support that choice despite Marozsan's better recent hard-court results. Court Shark's scoreline forecast gives Bublik a 48% chance of winning in straight sets, with a median total of 23 games.

The forecast's middle half runs from 20 to 31 games, leaving room for a substantially longer match than a routine straight-sets result. Marozsan's task is to make Bublik's return games matter: if service holds accumulate on both sides, their similar career tiebreak records become more relevant.

How long it could go

Article snapshot, Oct 21, 2026 · Not live

A 57% chance the match lasts 20 to 31 games; 23 is the middle of the range.

Chance of each total number of games in the match
Total gamesChance
140.4%
151.2%
162.1%
174.6%
185.6%
197.9%
207.9%
215.1%
2210.4%
239.2%
240.6%
253.4%
267.0%
271.7%
282.3%
292.5%
302.7%
314.1%
324.8%
333.1%
342.2%
354.4%
363.5%
370.2%
381.1%
391.9%
Source: Court Shark model and match data.

Explore this matchup

Compare both players side by side: recent results, surfaces, serve and return.

Player comparison

Article snapshot, Oct 21, 2026 · Not live

Each measure on the same scale: recent wins, wins on this surface, head-to-head wins and the model's chance.

Player comparison
MeasureAlexander BublikFabian Marozsan
Wins, last 10 matches50% (5-5)60% (6-4)
Wins, last 10 on hard40% (4-6)60% (6-4)
Model win probability71%29%
Source: Court Shark model and match data.

Recent form

Article snapshot, Oct 21, 2026 · Not live

Each player's most recent completed matches, up to 10, oldest on the left.

Recent results by player, oldest first
PlayerDateResultOpponentScoreEvent
Alexander BublikJul 24, 2026WTomas Martin Etcheverry6-3 6-4Kitzbuhel
Alexander BublikJul 25, 2026LQuentin Halys4-6 6-7(6)Kitzbuhel
Alexander BublikAug 30, 2026WJ J Wolf6-4 6-2 3-6 6-1US Open
Alexander BublikSep 2, 2026WAdrian Mannarino6-3 6-1 6-1US Open
Alexander BublikSep 4, 2026LTommy Paul4-6 6-3 7-6(4) 1-6 3-6US Open
Alexander BublikSep 25, 2026LRafael Jodar2-6 3-6Laver Cup
Alexander BublikOct 1, 2026LJakub Mensik4-6 6-7(5)Beijing
Alexander BublikOct 9, 2026WTomas Machac6-4 7-6(4)Shanghai Masters
Alexander BublikOct 11, 2026WBrandon Nakashima6-7(7) 6-3 7-6(5)Shanghai Masters
Alexander BublikOct 13, 2026LAlexander Zverev6-7(6) 6-4 6-7(1)Shanghai Masters
Fabian MarozsanAug 26, 2026WMiomir Kecmanovic6-3 6-4Winston-Salem
Fabian MarozsanAug 27, 2026WMartin Damm2-6 6-3 6-3Winston-Salem
Fabian MarozsanAug 28, 2026LJames Duckworth7-6(4) 2-6 4-6Winston-Salem
Fabian MarozsanSep 2, 2026LMichael Zheng4-6 4-6 2-6US Open
Fabian MarozsanSep 21, 2026WLouis Van Herck6-4 6-4Davis Cup WG1 R1: HUN vs LUX
Fabian MarozsanSep 24, 2026WAlex Bolt6-4 6-2Hangzhou
Fabian MarozsanSep 25, 2026WTaro Daniel6-7(2) 7-5 7-6(1)Hangzhou
Fabian MarozsanSep 27, 2026LKyrian Jacquet6-7(12) 4-6Hangzhou
Fabian MarozsanOct 8, 2026LZachary Svajda3-6 6-7(2)Shanghai Masters
Fabian MarozsanOct 20, 2026WTimofey Skatov7-5 7-6(4)ATP Almaty
Source: Court Shark model and match data.

Win rate by surface

Article snapshot, Oct 21, 2026 · Not live

Share of matches won on each surface across each player's last 50 matches with full statistics.

Win rate by surface
SurfaceAlexander BublikFabian Marozsan
Hard59% (16-11)45% (14-17)
Clay53% (8-7)50% (5-5)
Grass63% (5-3)56% (5-4)
Source: Court Shark model and match data.

Serve and return on hard courts

Article snapshot, Oct 21, 2026 · Not live

How often each player held serve and broke serve on hard over their last 50 matches with full statistics, against the tour's all-years average on the surface.

Hold and break rates on hard
MeasureAlexander BublikFabian MarozsanTour average, all years
Service games held87%81%77%
Return games broken16%19%23%
Matches in sample2731
Source: Court Shark model and match data.

Model and market on Alexander Bublik

Article snapshot, Oct 21, 2026 · Not live

Alexander Bublik's chance as the market consensus priced it from the opening line, next to the Court Shark model.

Alexander Bublik's chance to win
ReadingAlexander BublikFabian Marozsan
Opening consensus65%35%
Latest consensus71%29%
Court Shark model71%29%
Source: Court Shark model and pre-match market consensus.

Model win probability

Article snapshot, Oct 21, 2026 · Not live

The Court Shark model's chance for each player to win this match.

Model win probability by player
PlayerWin probabilityRecent form (last 10)
Alexander Bublik71%5-5
Fabian Marozsan29%6-4
Source: Court Shark model and match data.

Ways to win

Article snapshot, Oct 21, 2026 · Not live

Every way the match can finish. The likeliest single result is Alexander Bublik in straight sets (48%).

Chance of each final set score
ResultChance
Alexander Bublik wins 2-048%
Alexander Bublik wins 2-123%
Fabian Marozsan wins 2-114%
Fabian Marozsan wins 2-015%
Source: Court Shark model and match data.

Two years of form

Article snapshot, Oct 21, 2026 · Not live

Each player's pre-match Elo rating since Oct 23, 2024. Latest: Alexander Bublik 2023 (Oct 13, 2026), Fabian Marozsan 1887 (Oct 8, 2026).

Pre-match Elo rating over the last two years
PlayerStart of windowTwo-year peakLatest
Alexander Bublik1873 (Oct 23, 2024)2131 (Feb 14, 2026)2023 (Oct 13, 2026)
Fabian Marozsan1844 (Oct 23, 2024)1949 (Feb 18, 2026)1887 (Oct 8, 2026)
Source: Court Shark model and match data.
Explore this matchup

Court Shark win probabilities are statistical estimates, not advice. No outcome is guaranteed.

Methodology and sources

How we build model estimates and where our information comes from.

Model estimates and observed results

The win probabilities come from the Court Shark match model, trained on completed ATP and WTA matches. A probability says how often a player in this position wins, not that one result will happen. The model's number for a match is recorded before play and never changed afterwards, so it can be checked against the result.

Sources and citations

Results, scores, rankings and serve statistics come from the Court Shark match database. The market consensus is the pre-match price for each player converted to a probability. Figures in this article are a snapshot taken when it was written.

Limitations

Serve and return rates count only matches with full serve statistics, which are sparser for Challenger and lower-level events, and the tour average they are compared with covers every year on record. Head-to-head records count every meeting with a recorded winner, walkovers and retirements included. Charts and tables are a snapshot and do not update after publication.

About the desk

Who works on the Tennis Desk and how an article is put together. Read about the desk

Editorial standards

What we publish, what we check and how we decide what is fit to print. Read our standards

Corrections

Spotted an error? Write to hello@courtshark.ai and we will correct it and note the change. Read the corrections policy

Share this analysis

Email