Mirra Andreeva Faces Alexandrova's Beijing Edge
Mirra Andreeva has the form edge in Beijing, but Ekaterina Alexandrova brings a perfect record from their previous meetings.
Mirra Andreeva brings the stronger recent record into Beijing, while Ekaterina Alexandrova owns the meetings that gave this matchup its edge. The Court Shark model favors Andreeva, but by less than the market consensus does.
Form has changed the balance
Form favors Mirra Andreeva, but Ekaterina Alexandrova has earned more respect in this pairing than the rankings alone suggest. Andreeva arrives at the first qualifying round with an 8-2 record across her last 10 matches, while Alexandrova is 6-4 over the same span. Those are clear results. They also frame a match where recent output points one way and prior meetings point another.
Andreeva is No. 5, and Alexandrova is No. 28. That gap explains the broad expectation around a player whose form has stayed steady through the recent hard court swing, yet it does not erase Alexandrova's practical success against her. Alexandrova has won their head-to-head 2-0, which is a small sample but a real part of the contest's history. Reputation matters here. So does the evidence that Alexandrova has found answers in each previous meeting.
Both players come in fresh after playing on October 6. There is no long layoff to explain away either player's level, and neither will have to rediscover match rhythm at the start. The contrast is simple: Andreeva has built the better overall run, while Alexandrova has established a matchup advantage that has yet to be reversed. Beijing gives them a chance to test which signal carries further.
Model win probability
Article snapshot, Oct 7, 2026 · Not live
The Court Shark model's chance for each player to win this match.
| Player | Win probability | Recent form (last 10) |
|---|---|---|
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | 37% | 6-4 |
| Mirra Andreeva | 63% | 8-2 |
Alexandrova has momentum of her own
Alexandrova's recent record should not be read as a weak run. She has won her past three matches in Beijing, and the latest was a 6-2 6-2 result against Linda Noskova. That sequence matters because it shows her settling into the conditions rather than arriving cold for a difficult opponent. She has work to build on.
Her path has also required some recovery. Alexandrova came through a three-set win over Diana Shnaider before handling Noskova cleanly, so her current run has included both pressure and control. The win over Aliaksandra Sasnovich started the run, giving her a continuous stretch of useful court time at this event. That is different from relying on an older peak. Her best tennis has been close at hand.
Andreeva's case is stronger on volume and consistency. Her 8-2 recent record includes a 6-2 6-2 win over Daria Snigur in her latest match, another straight-set result after a three-set comeback against Yue Yuan. She has won her past three matches too. The difference is that Andreeva's run has carried across the wider period with fewer interruptions.
This is where reputation and form meet. Andreeva's ranking reflects a higher standing, and her recent results support it, but Alexandrova's Beijing matches offer a more immediate counterargument than her overall record might imply. A player who has already absorbed a long contest and then played freely can be awkward to face. Alexandrova needs that sequence to continue.
Recent form
Article snapshot, Oct 7, 2026 · Not live
Each player's most recent completed matches, up to 10, oldest on the left.
| Player | Date | Result | Opponent | Score | Event |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | Aug 11, 2026 | L | Elina Svitolina | 6-3 0-6 3-6 | Toronto |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | Aug 16, 2026 | W | Anna Blinkova | 6-7(5) 6-4 7-5 | Cincinnati |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | Aug 18, 2026 | L | Sara Bejlek | 6-4 1-6 2-6 | Cincinnati |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | Aug 27, 2026 | L | Clara Tauson | 6-7(6) 6-4 3-6 | Monterrey |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | Aug 30, 2026 | W | Mccartney Kessler | 6-2 6-2 | US Open |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | Sep 2, 2026 | W | Kimberly Birrell | 6-1 2-6 6-3 | US Open |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | Sep 4, 2026 | L | Marta Kostyuk | 3-6 2-6 | US Open |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | Oct 2, 2026 | W | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | 6-1 6-4 | WTA Beijing |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | Oct 4, 2026 | W | Diana Shnaider | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | WTA Beijing |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | Oct 6, 2026 | W | Linda Noskova | 6-2 6-2 | WTA Beijing |
| Mirra Andreeva | Sep 1, 2026 | W | Janice Tjen | 6-2 6-2 | US Open |
| Mirra Andreeva | Sep 3, 2026 | W | Eva Lys | 6-0 6-2 | US Open |
| Mirra Andreeva | Sep 5, 2026 | W | Nikola Bartunkova | 6-2 7-6(5) | US Open |
| Mirra Andreeva | Sep 7, 2026 | W | Anastasia Potapova | 5-7 6-4 6-3 | US Open |
| Mirra Andreeva | Sep 9, 2026 | L | Cori Gauff | 6-2 6-7(7) 2-6 | US Open |
| Mirra Andreeva | Sep 23, 2026 | W | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | 6-2 6-2 | Singapore |
| Mirra Andreeva | Sep 25, 2026 | L | Leylah Fernandez | 2-6 5-7 | Singapore |
| Mirra Andreeva | Oct 2, 2026 | W | Yue Yuan | 3-6 6-0 6-0 | WTA Beijing |
| Mirra Andreeva | Oct 4, 2026 | W | Polina Kudermetova | 6-4 6-1 | WTA Beijing |
| Mirra Andreeva | Oct 6, 2026 | W | Daria Snigur | 6-2 6-2 | WTA Beijing |
Hard courts offer the clearest comparison
The hard court records favor Andreeva, even before the ranking gap enters the discussion. Alexandrova has won 53% of her recent hard court matches, while Andreeva has won 69%. That is a meaningful difference over the available sample, and it fits the recent form records that put Andreeva ahead. Her baseline level has been higher.
Alexandrova does have a credible serving platform. She has held serve in 72% of her recent hard court matches, compared with 74% for Andreeva, which leaves little separation in that phase. Serve can keep the match close. It may also let Alexandrova attack more freely behind her first delivery if she finds the court early.
The larger contrast is on return. Andreeva has broken serve in 46% of those matches, while Alexandrova's figure is 31%, suggesting that Andreeva has created more sustained pressure across her hard court schedule. That matters especially in a best-of-three match, where one loose service game can decide a set. Andreeva has the better chance to make the contest physical and repetitive from the baseline.
Still, the surface history between them is incomplete. Their previous meetings came on clay and grass, leaving no hard court result to settle whether Alexandrova's direct style can again disrupt Andreeva's patterns. Alexandrova won the latest meeting at Bad Homburg 6-3 6-4. That result does not answer the Beijing question, but it shows the matchup has contained more resistance than a ranking comparison suggests.
Head-to-head by surface
Article snapshot, Oct 7, 2026 · Not live
Ekaterina Alexandrova and Mirra Andreeva have met 2 times. Ekaterina Alexandrova leads 2-0.
| Surface | Ekaterina Alexandrova | Mirra Andreeva |
|---|---|---|
| All surfaces | 2 | 0 |
| Clay | 1 | 0 |
| Grass | 1 | 0 |
What the model says
The market consensus has Alexandrova at 26% and Andreeva at 74%, and it has remained flat since the opening reading. That is a firm view of Andreeva as the favorite, built around her ranking and stronger recent record. The public expectation is clear. Alexandrova's prior success has not materially narrowed it.
The model gives Alexandrova a 37% chance and Andreeva a 63% chance. It still favors Andreeva, while leaving more room for Alexandrova's current Beijing run and head-to-head record than the market consensus does. The difference is substantial. It makes this a form-against-reputation match rather than a routine ranking call.
For Alexandrova, the route is direct. She needs to protect serve and keep the first exchanges short enough to avoid allowing Andreeva to establish repeated return pressure. For Andreeva, the task is to turn her stronger hard court return record into early scoreboard control. The recent meetings prove Alexandrova can make her uncomfortable.
What would change the call is clear evidence that Alexandrova's serve is not holding up under Andreeva's return pressure, or that Andreeva cannot sustain the clean baseline control shown in her recent Beijing wins.
Model and market on Ekaterina Alexandrova
Article snapshot, Oct 7, 2026 · Not live
Ekaterina Alexandrova's chance as the market consensus priced it from the opening line, next to the Court Shark model.
| Reading | Ekaterina Alexandrova | Mirra Andreeva |
|---|---|---|
| Opening consensus | 26% | 74% |
| Latest consensus | 26% | 74% |
| Court Shark model | 37% | 63% |
Explore this matchup
Compare both players side by side: recent results, surfaces, serve and return.
Player comparison
Article snapshot, Oct 7, 2026 · Not live
Each measure on the same scale: recent wins, wins on this surface, head-to-head wins and the model's chance.
| Measure | Ekaterina Alexandrova | Mirra Andreeva |
|---|---|---|
| Wins, last 10 matches | 60% (6-4) | 80% (8-2) |
| Wins, last 10 on hard | 60% (6-4) | 80% (8-2) |
| Head-to-head wins | 100% (2-0) | 0% (0-2) |
| Model win probability | 37% | 63% |
Win rate by surface
Article snapshot, Oct 7, 2026 · Not live
Share of matches won on each surface across each player's last 50 matches with full statistics.
| Surface | Ekaterina Alexandrova | Mirra Andreeva |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 53% (19-17) | 69% (20-9) |
| Clay | 20% (1-4) | 83% (15-3) |
| Grass | 56% (5-4) | Too few matches (3) |
Serve and return on hard courts
Article snapshot, Oct 7, 2026 · Not live
How often each player held serve and broke serve on hard over their last 50 matches with full statistics, against the tour's all-years average on the surface.
| Measure | Ekaterina Alexandrova | Mirra Andreeva | Tour average, all years |
|---|---|---|---|
| Service games held | 72% | 74% | 63% |
| Return games broken | 31% | 46% | 37% |
| Matches in sample | 36 | 29 |
Court Shark win probabilities are statistical estimates, not advice. No outcome is guaranteed.
Methodology and sources
How we build model estimates and where our information comes from.
Model estimates and observed results
The win probabilities come from the Court Shark match model, trained on completed ATP and WTA matches. A probability says how often a player in this position wins, not that one result will happen. The model's number for a match is recorded before play and never changed afterwards, so it can be checked against the result.
Sources and citations
Results, scores, rankings and serve statistics come from the Court Shark match database. The market consensus is the pre-match price for each player converted to a probability. Figures in this article are a snapshot taken when it was written.
Limitations
Serve and return rates count only matches with full serve statistics, which are sparser for Challenger and lower-level events, and the tour average they are compared with covers every year on record. Head-to-head records count every meeting with a recorded winner, walkovers and retirements included. Charts and tables are a snapshot and do not update after publication.
About the desk
Who writes the Journal and how an article is put together. Read about the desk
Editorial standards
What we publish, what we check and how we decide what is fit to print. Read our standards
Corrections
Spotted an error? Write to hello@courtshark.ai and we will correct it and note the change. Read the corrections policy