Skip to content
Court Shark Tennis Desk

Mirra Andreeva Faces Alexandrova's Beijing Edge

Mirra Andreeva has the form edge in Beijing, but Ekaterina Alexandrova brings a perfect record from their previous meetings.

Share

Mirra Andreeva brings the stronger recent record into Beijing, while Ekaterina Alexandrova owns the meetings that gave this matchup its edge. The Court Shark model favors Andreeva, but by less than the market consensus does.

Form has changed the balance

Form favors Mirra Andreeva, but Ekaterina Alexandrova has earned more respect in this pairing than the rankings alone suggest. Andreeva arrives at the first qualifying round with an 8-2 record across her last 10 matches, while Alexandrova is 6-4 over the same span. Those are clear results. They also frame a match where recent output points one way and prior meetings point another.

Andreeva is No. 5, and Alexandrova is No. 28. That gap explains the broad expectation around a player whose form has stayed steady through the recent hard court swing, yet it does not erase Alexandrova's practical success against her. Alexandrova has won their head-to-head 2-0, which is a small sample but a real part of the contest's history. Reputation matters here. So does the evidence that Alexandrova has found answers in each previous meeting.

Both players come in fresh after playing on October 6. There is no long layoff to explain away either player's level, and neither will have to rediscover match rhythm at the start. The contrast is simple: Andreeva has built the better overall run, while Alexandrova has established a matchup advantage that has yet to be reversed. Beijing gives them a chance to test which signal carries further.

Model win probability

Article snapshot, Oct 7, 2026 · Not live

The Court Shark model's chance for each player to win this match.

Model win probability by player
PlayerWin probabilityRecent form (last 10)
Ekaterina Alexandrova37%6-4
Mirra Andreeva63%8-2
Source: Court Shark model and match data.

Alexandrova has momentum of her own

Alexandrova's recent record should not be read as a weak run. She has won her past three matches in Beijing, and the latest was a 6-2 6-2 result against Linda Noskova. That sequence matters because it shows her settling into the conditions rather than arriving cold for a difficult opponent. She has work to build on.

Her path has also required some recovery. Alexandrova came through a three-set win over Diana Shnaider before handling Noskova cleanly, so her current run has included both pressure and control. The win over Aliaksandra Sasnovich started the run, giving her a continuous stretch of useful court time at this event. That is different from relying on an older peak. Her best tennis has been close at hand.

Andreeva's case is stronger on volume and consistency. Her 8-2 recent record includes a 6-2 6-2 win over Daria Snigur in her latest match, another straight-set result after a three-set comeback against Yue Yuan. She has won her past three matches too. The difference is that Andreeva's run has carried across the wider period with fewer interruptions.

This is where reputation and form meet. Andreeva's ranking reflects a higher standing, and her recent results support it, but Alexandrova's Beijing matches offer a more immediate counterargument than her overall record might imply. A player who has already absorbed a long contest and then played freely can be awkward to face. Alexandrova needs that sequence to continue.

Recent form

Article snapshot, Oct 7, 2026 · Not live

Each player's most recent completed matches, up to 10, oldest on the left.

Recent results by player, oldest first
PlayerDateResultOpponentScoreEvent
Ekaterina AlexandrovaAug 11, 2026LElina Svitolina6-3 0-6 3-6Toronto
Ekaterina AlexandrovaAug 16, 2026WAnna Blinkova6-7(5) 6-4 7-5Cincinnati
Ekaterina AlexandrovaAug 18, 2026LSara Bejlek6-4 1-6 2-6Cincinnati
Ekaterina AlexandrovaAug 27, 2026LClara Tauson6-7(6) 6-4 3-6Monterrey
Ekaterina AlexandrovaAug 30, 2026WMccartney Kessler6-2 6-2US Open
Ekaterina AlexandrovaSep 2, 2026WKimberly Birrell6-1 2-6 6-3US Open
Ekaterina AlexandrovaSep 4, 2026LMarta Kostyuk3-6 2-6US Open
Ekaterina AlexandrovaOct 2, 2026WAliaksandra Sasnovich6-1 6-4WTA Beijing
Ekaterina AlexandrovaOct 4, 2026WDiana Shnaider3-6 6-4 6-3WTA Beijing
Ekaterina AlexandrovaOct 6, 2026WLinda Noskova6-2 6-2WTA Beijing
Mirra AndreevaSep 1, 2026WJanice Tjen6-2 6-2US Open
Mirra AndreevaSep 3, 2026WEva Lys6-0 6-2US Open
Mirra AndreevaSep 5, 2026WNikola Bartunkova6-2 7-6(5)US Open
Mirra AndreevaSep 7, 2026WAnastasia Potapova5-7 6-4 6-3US Open
Mirra AndreevaSep 9, 2026LCori Gauff6-2 6-7(7) 2-6US Open
Mirra AndreevaSep 23, 2026WAliaksandra Sasnovich6-2 6-2Singapore
Mirra AndreevaSep 25, 2026LLeylah Fernandez2-6 5-7Singapore
Mirra AndreevaOct 2, 2026WYue Yuan3-6 6-0 6-0WTA Beijing
Mirra AndreevaOct 4, 2026WPolina Kudermetova6-4 6-1WTA Beijing
Mirra AndreevaOct 6, 2026WDaria Snigur6-2 6-2WTA Beijing
Source: Court Shark model and match data.

Hard courts offer the clearest comparison

The hard court records favor Andreeva, even before the ranking gap enters the discussion. Alexandrova has won 53% of her recent hard court matches, while Andreeva has won 69%. That is a meaningful difference over the available sample, and it fits the recent form records that put Andreeva ahead. Her baseline level has been higher.

Alexandrova does have a credible serving platform. She has held serve in 72% of her recent hard court matches, compared with 74% for Andreeva, which leaves little separation in that phase. Serve can keep the match close. It may also let Alexandrova attack more freely behind her first delivery if she finds the court early.

The larger contrast is on return. Andreeva has broken serve in 46% of those matches, while Alexandrova's figure is 31%, suggesting that Andreeva has created more sustained pressure across her hard court schedule. That matters especially in a best-of-three match, where one loose service game can decide a set. Andreeva has the better chance to make the contest physical and repetitive from the baseline.

Still, the surface history between them is incomplete. Their previous meetings came on clay and grass, leaving no hard court result to settle whether Alexandrova's direct style can again disrupt Andreeva's patterns. Alexandrova won the latest meeting at Bad Homburg 6-3 6-4. That result does not answer the Beijing question, but it shows the matchup has contained more resistance than a ranking comparison suggests.

Head-to-head by surface

Article snapshot, Oct 7, 2026 · Not live

Ekaterina Alexandrova and Mirra Andreeva have met 2 times. Ekaterina Alexandrova leads 2-0.

Head-to-head record, Ekaterina Alexandrova first
SurfaceEkaterina AlexandrovaMirra Andreeva
All surfaces20
Clay10
Grass10
Source: Court Shark model and match data.

What the model says

The market consensus has Alexandrova at 26% and Andreeva at 74%, and it has remained flat since the opening reading. That is a firm view of Andreeva as the favorite, built around her ranking and stronger recent record. The public expectation is clear. Alexandrova's prior success has not materially narrowed it.

The model gives Alexandrova a 37% chance and Andreeva a 63% chance. It still favors Andreeva, while leaving more room for Alexandrova's current Beijing run and head-to-head record than the market consensus does. The difference is substantial. It makes this a form-against-reputation match rather than a routine ranking call.

For Alexandrova, the route is direct. She needs to protect serve and keep the first exchanges short enough to avoid allowing Andreeva to establish repeated return pressure. For Andreeva, the task is to turn her stronger hard court return record into early scoreboard control. The recent meetings prove Alexandrova can make her uncomfortable.

What would change the call is clear evidence that Alexandrova's serve is not holding up under Andreeva's return pressure, or that Andreeva cannot sustain the clean baseline control shown in her recent Beijing wins.

Model and market on Ekaterina Alexandrova

Article snapshot, Oct 7, 2026 · Not live

Ekaterina Alexandrova's chance as the market consensus priced it from the opening line, next to the Court Shark model.

Ekaterina Alexandrova's chance to win
ReadingEkaterina AlexandrovaMirra Andreeva
Opening consensus26%74%
Latest consensus26%74%
Court Shark model37%63%
Source: Court Shark model and pre-match market consensus.

Explore this matchup

Compare both players side by side: recent results, surfaces, serve and return.

Player comparison

Article snapshot, Oct 7, 2026 · Not live

Each measure on the same scale: recent wins, wins on this surface, head-to-head wins and the model's chance.

Player comparison
MeasureEkaterina AlexandrovaMirra Andreeva
Wins, last 10 matches60% (6-4)80% (8-2)
Wins, last 10 on hard60% (6-4)80% (8-2)
Head-to-head wins100% (2-0)0% (0-2)
Model win probability37%63%
Source: Court Shark model and match data.

Win rate by surface

Article snapshot, Oct 7, 2026 · Not live

Share of matches won on each surface across each player's last 50 matches with full statistics.

Win rate by surface
SurfaceEkaterina AlexandrovaMirra Andreeva
Hard53% (19-17)69% (20-9)
Clay20% (1-4)83% (15-3)
Grass56% (5-4)Too few matches (3)
Source: Court Shark model and match data.

Serve and return on hard courts

Article snapshot, Oct 7, 2026 · Not live

How often each player held serve and broke serve on hard over their last 50 matches with full statistics, against the tour's all-years average on the surface.

Hold and break rates on hard
MeasureEkaterina AlexandrovaMirra AndreevaTour average, all years
Service games held72%74%63%
Return games broken31%46%37%
Matches in sample3629
Source: Court Shark model and match data.
Explore this matchup

Court Shark win probabilities are statistical estimates, not advice. No outcome is guaranteed.

Methodology and sources

How we build model estimates and where our information comes from.

Model estimates and observed results

The win probabilities come from the Court Shark match model, trained on completed ATP and WTA matches. A probability says how often a player in this position wins, not that one result will happen. The model's number for a match is recorded before play and never changed afterwards, so it can be checked against the result.

Sources and citations

Results, scores, rankings and serve statistics come from the Court Shark match database. The market consensus is the pre-match price for each player converted to a probability. Figures in this article are a snapshot taken when it was written.

Limitations

Serve and return rates count only matches with full serve statistics, which are sparser for Challenger and lower-level events, and the tour average they are compared with covers every year on record. Head-to-head records count every meeting with a recorded winner, walkovers and retirements included. Charts and tables are a snapshot and do not update after publication.

About the desk

Who writes the Journal and how an article is put together. Read about the desk

Editorial standards

What we publish, what we check and how we decide what is fit to print. Read our standards

Corrections

Spotted an error? Write to hello@courtshark.ai and we will correct it and note the change. Read the corrections policy

Share this analysis

Email